| More WNBA Games |
Swipe left to see more →
| Monday, 07/07/2025 7:30 PM (ET) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gm# | Record | Open | Latest | ML | 1H | |
 GS | 621 | 9-8 | 157 | 158 | +250 | 80 |
 ATL | 622 | 11-7 | -6.5 | -7.5 | -330 | -4 |
| Matchup Content Menu |
Swipe left to see more →
Tip SheetSimulation & Ratings🔒Betting Systems🔒Team Trends🔒Team StatsSchedule & ResultsHead-to-Head🔒Coaches🔒
| Key Coaching Trends |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Golden State. | |
|---|---|
 | Bet on Natalie Nakase on the money line after 2 consecutive division games. Nakase's record as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 4-1 (80%) with an average money line of +331. (+14.2 unit$, ROI=284.0%) The average score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 83.8, Opponents 75.2 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the money line after playing a game as an underdog. Nakase's record as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 8-4 (67%) with an average money line of +218. (+18.8 unit$, ROI=156.3%) The average score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 79.6, Opponents 78.2 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the money line after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog. Nakase's record as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-3 (67%) with an average money line of +253. (+17.0 unit$, ROI=188.3%) The average score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 80.4, Opponents 78.3 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the money line versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game. Nakase's record as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 5-1 (83%) with an average money line of +109. (+12.2 unit$, ROI=203.3%) The average score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 82.3, Opponents 74.8 |
 | Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line in all games game where where the first half total is 81 or less. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-0 (100%) with an average line of +1.5. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=77.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 42.7, Opponents 32.9 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line versus the first half line in all games. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 13-3 (81%) with an average line of +3.5. (+9.7 unit$, ROI=51.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 40.8, Opponents 38.0 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line in May, June, or July games. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 13-3 (81%) with an average line of +3.5. (+9.7 unit$, ROI=51.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 40.8, Opponents 38.0 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line when playing 5 or less games in 14 days. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 8-1 (89%) with an average line of +3.5. (+6.9 unit$, ROI=69.7%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 43.9, Opponents 38.8 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line after 1 or more consecutive losses. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-0 (100%) with an average line of +3.5. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=77.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 40.6, Opponents 37.3 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-0 (100%) with an average line of +5.0. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 43.0, Opponents 37.3 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line when playing against a team with a winning record. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 10-1 (91%) with an average line of +6.0. (+8.9 unit$, ROI=73.6%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 39.2, Opponents 38.2 |
| Bet against Karl Smesko on the 1st half line after 2 or more consecutive overs. Smesko's record on the 1st half line as coach of ATLANTA: 0-6 (0%) with an average line of -3.5. (-6.6 unit$, ROI=-100.0%) The average 1st half score of these games was ATLANTA 35.7, Opponents 36.8 |
| Bet against Karl Smesko in road games on the 1st half line after playing a game as favorite. Smesko's record on the 1st half line as coach of ATLANTA: 0-6 (0%) with an average line of -3.5. (-6.6 unit$, ROI=-100.0%) The average 1st half score of these games was ATLANTA 39.7, Opponents 40.2 |
| Bet against Karl Smesko on the 1st half line versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game. Smesko's record on the 1st half line as coach of ATLANTA: 0-7 (0%) with an average line of -3.0. (-7.7 unit$, ROI=-100.0%) The average 1st half score of these games was ATLANTA 38.0, Opponents 41.0 |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Over. | |
|---|---|
 | Bet over the total in Karl Smesko games when playing against a team with a winning record. The Over's record as coach of ATLANTA: 6-0 (100%) with an average over/under of 161.8. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%) The average score of these games was ATLANTA 87.8, Opponents 86.7 |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Under. | |
|---|---|
| Bet under the 1st half total in Natalie Nakase games after a division game. The 1st half Under's record as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 8-1 (89%) with an average 1st half over/under of 81.0. (+6.9 unit$, ROI=69.7%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 37.9, Opponents 38.0 |
| Bet under the 1st half total in Karl Smesko games after playing a home game. The 1st half Under's record as coach of ATLANTA: 8-1 (89%) with an average 1st half over/under of 82.0. (+6.9 unit$, ROI=69.7%) The average 1st half score of these games was ATLANTA 39.6, Opponents 35.1 |
| Natalie Nakase Coach Trends |
Swipe left to see more →
| Natalie Nakase - betting records as head coach. | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career records as head coach of Golden State. | |||||||
| Game | Money Line | 1st Half | |||||
| Description | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U | |
| against Eastern conference opponents | 5-2 | 1-4 | 4-3 | +8.3 | 5-1 | 2-5 | |
| in all games | 10-6 | 5-10 | 9-8 | +18.6 | 13-3 | 5-12 | |
| as an underdog | 9-5 | 4-9 | 7-8 | +16.6 | 12-3 | 4-11 | |
| as an underdog of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 5-3 | 2-6 | 4-4 | +5.3 | 7-1 | 2-6 | |
| as a road underdog | 3-4 | 2-4 | 2-5 | +3 | 4-3 | 2-5 | |
| in all games where where the total is 159.5 or less | 4-3 | 3-4 | 5-2 | +9.3 | 6-0 | 1-6 | |
| in road games | 3-4 | 2-4 | 2-5 | +3 | 4-3 | 2-5 | |
| as a road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 1-2 | 2-1 | 1-2 | +0.2 | 2-1 | 1-2 | |
| in a road game where where the total is 159.5 or less | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | -2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | |
| in May, June, or July games | 10-6 | 5-10 | 9-8 | +18.6 | 13-3 | 5-12 | |
| on Mondays | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +2.2 | 0-1 | 1-0 | |
| in July games | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | |
| when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days | 6-4 | 4-5 | 5-6 | +11.3 | 8-2 | 4-7 | |
| when playing 5 or less games in 14 days | 5-3 | 3-5 | 4-5 | +9 | 8-1 | 3-6 | |
| when playing 3 or less games in 10 days | 1-3 | 0-2 | 1-3 | +3.5 | 2-2 | 0-4 | |
| off a road loss | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-2 | +8.5 | 4-0 | 1-3 | |
| off a loss against a division rival | 3-1 | 2-1 | 3-1 | +10.3 | 4-0 | 0-4 | |
| off a road loss against a division rival | 2-0 | 1-0 | 2-0 | +9.5 | 2-0 | 0-2 | |
| after playing a road game | 4-1 | 2-2 | 3-3 | +12 | 5-1 | 1-5 | |
| versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game | 7-4 | 5-6 | 7-5 | +14 | 9-2 | 4-8 | |
| versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game | 7-4 | 5-6 | 7-5 | +14 | 9-2 | 4-8 | |
| versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game | 7-4 | 5-6 | 7-5 | +14 | 9-2 | 4-8 | |
| versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game | 4-1 | 2-4 | 3-3 | +6.3 | 6-0 | 2-4 | |
| versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | |
| when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-3 | 3-6 | 5-6 | +12.6 | 10-1 | 2-9 | |
| when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) | 3-1 | 2-2 | 3-1 | +8.3 | 4-0 | 0-4 | |
| versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game | 3-1 | 1-3 | 2-3 | +4.3 | 5-0 | 2-3 | |
| versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season | 1-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | +5.5 | 1-0 | 0-1 | |
| versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game | 6-3 | 4-5 | 5-5 | +12 | 8-2 | 3-7 | |
| versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game | 4-2 | 2-3 | 5-1 | +12.2 | 3-2 | 2-4 | |
| Karl Smesko Coach Trends |
Swipe left to see more →
| Karl Smesko - betting records as head coach. | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career records as head coach of Atlanta. | |||||||
| Game | Money Line | 1st Half | |||||
| Description | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U | |
| against Western conference opponents | 3-2 | 4-2 | 3-3 | -2.8 | 2-4 | 1-5 | |
| in all games | 10-7 | 11-7 | 11-7 | -5.6 | 8-10 | 5-12 | |
| as a favorite | 6-6 | 6-6 | 8-4 | -7.7 | 5-7 | 3-9 | |
| in home games | 5-4 | 5-5 | 7-3 | +2.8 | 3-7 | 3-7 | |
| in all games where where the total is 159.5 or less | 4-4 | 6-3 | 6-3 | -2.5 | 2-7 | 3-6 | |
| as a home favorite | 5-3 | 4-4 | 7-1 | +4.8 | 3-5 | 2-6 | |
| as a favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 4-3 | 2-5 | 5-2 | -2.5 | 4-3 | 2-5 | |
| in a home game where where the total is 159.5 or less | 2-3 | 4-2 | 4-2 | +0.8 | 1-5 | 3-3 | |
| as a home favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 3-1 | 1-3 | 4-0 | +4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | |
| in May, June, or July games | 10-7 | 11-7 | 11-7 | -5.6 | 8-10 | 5-12 | |
| in July games | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | -1.2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | |
| on Mondays | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | |
| when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days | 5-4 | 6-4 | 7-3 | +3.5 | 3-7 | 3-7 | |
| when playing 5 or less games in 14 days | 4-2 | 3-3 | 4-2 | -3 | 3-3 | 2-4 | |
| when playing 3 or less games in 10 days | 2-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | -4 | 0-3 | 0-3 | |
| after 3 or more consecutive overs | 1-1 | 0-2 | 1-1 | -3.5 | 0-2 | 0-2 | |
| off a upset loss as a favorite | 2-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | +2.2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | |
| off a home loss | 2-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | |
| off an upset loss as a home favorite | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | |
| after playing a home game | 6-3 | 4-5 | 7-2 | +0.5 | 4-5 | 1-8 | |
| after playing 3 consecutive home games | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +1.2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | |
| versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -5 | 0-2 | 0-2 | |
| versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game | 7-5 | 9-4 | 8-5 | -5.8 | 5-8 | 4-9 | |
| versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game | 7-5 | 9-4 | 8-5 | -5.8 | 5-8 | 4-9 | |
| versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | |
| versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game | 6-4 | 8-3 | 6-5 | -7.8 | 3-8 | 3-8 | |
| vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts | 3-3 | 6-1 | 2-5 | -11.5 | 3-4 | 2-5 | |
| versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game | 2-3 | 2-3 | 4-1 | -1.5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | |
| when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-1 | 6-0 | 3-3 | +1.7 | 3-3 | 2-3 | |
| when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | +0.5 | 0-2 | 0-2 | |
| versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game | 5-2 | 6-2 | 4-4 | -2.8 | 3-5 | 2-6 | |
| versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game | 3-3 | 3-3 | 5-1 | +0.2 | 2-4 | 2-4 | |