Swipe left to see more →
| Monday, 04/07/2025 8:50 PM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCAA Tournament - Championship - Alamodome - San Antonio, TX | |||||||
| Gm# | NET | Record | Open | Latest | ML | 1H | |
3  FLA | 701 | 4 | 36-4 | -1 | -1 | -115 | -0.5 |
2  HOU | 702 | 3 | 35-5 | 141.5 | 140.5 | -105 | 66 |
Matchup Content Menu |
Swipe left to see more →
Tip SheetSimulation & Ratings🔒Betting Systems🔒Team Trends🔒Team StatsPlayers Stats & InjuriesSchedule & ResultsHead-to-Head🔒Coaches🔒
Explore top coach betting trends for upcoming games, covering records vs. the spread, money line, over/under, 1st half odds, and 1st half totals. Trends displayed have a demonstrated edge against the line referenced, and encompass both the coaches' entire career, along with their current tenure with the team.
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Florida. | |
|---|---|
 | Bet on Todd Golden after a win by 6 points or less. Golden's record as coach of FLORIDA: 13-1 (93%) with an average line of -5.5. (+11.9 unit$, ROI=77.3%) The average score of these games was FLORIDA 88.4, Opponents 74.9 |
 | Bet on Todd Golden on the money line as a neutral court favorite. Golden's record as coach of FLORIDA: 18-3 (86%) with an average money line of -328. (+14.3 unit$, ROI=20.8%) The average score of these games was FLORIDA 83.8, Opponents 73.6 |
| Bet on Todd Golden in away or neutral games on the money line after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games. Golden's record as coach of FLORIDA: 13-2 (87%) with an average money line of -232. (+13.5 unit$, ROI=38.6%) The average score of these games was FLORIDA 82.8, Opponents 74.9 |
| Bet on Todd Golden on the money line after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games. Golden's record as coach of FLORIDA: 15-3 (83%) with an average money line of -320. (+14.5 unit$, ROI=25.1%) The average score of these games was FLORIDA 84.8, Opponents 74.7 |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Houston. | |
|---|---|
| Bet on Kelvin Sampson on the money line when playing only their 2nd game in 8 days. Sampson's record as coach of HOUSTON: 75-23 (77%) with an average money line of -337. (+43.8 unit$, ROI=13.3%) The average score of these games was HOUSTON 74.0, Opponents 61.7 |
| Bet on Kelvin Sampson on the money line versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games. Sampson's record as coach of HOUSTON: 14-2 (88%) with an average money line of -304. (+12.0 unit$, ROI=24.7%) The average score of these games was HOUSTON 75.1, Opponents 67.4 |
 | Bet on Kelvin Sampson on the 1st half line in a neutral court game where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5. Sampson's record on the 1st half line as coach of HOUSTON: 13-1 (93%) with an average line of -3.5. (+11.9 unit$, ROI=72.1%) The average 1st half score of these games was HOUSTON 37.1, Opponents 28.3 |
| Bet on Kelvin Sampson on the 1st half line in a neutral court game where the first half total is 65.5 to 68. Sampson's record on the 1st half line as coach of HOUSTON: 8-0 (100%) with an average line of -4.0. (+8.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was HOUSTON 36.9, Opponents 25.8 |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Under. | |
|---|---|
| Bet under the total in Kelvin Sampson games after a close win by 3 points or less. The Under's record as coach of HOUSTON: 16-3 (84%) with an average over/under of 135.7. (+12.7 unit$, ROI=57.7%) The average score of these games was HOUSTON 66.7, Opponents 59.2 |
Unlock expert insights with our comprehensive historical coaching betting trends page. Discover data-driven records, profitable handicapping strategies, and winning coaching trends tailored to current game conditions. Enhance your sports betting approach with detailed analysis and key metrics designed to elevate your betting edge.
Swipe left to see more →
| Todd Golden - betting records as head coach. | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career records as a head coach. | Games as head coach of Florida. | |||||||||||
| Game | Money Line | 1st Half | Game | Money Line | 1st Half | |||||||
| Description | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U |
| against Big 12 conference opponents | 1-5 | 2-4 | 2-4 | -2.6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 2-4 | -2.6 | 3-3 | 3-3 |
| in all games | 97-97 | 107-90 | 132-69 | -2.3 | 102-90 | 96-98 | 60-47 | 62-46 | 75-33 | +0.5 | 56-50 | 52-53 |
| as a favorite | 74-67 | 77-66 | 115-29 | +12.3 | 73-65 | 69-72 | 47-31 | 45-34 | 67-12 | +6.5 | 42-35 | 39-38 |
| when the total is 140 to 149.5 | 30-41 | 34-38 | 46-27 | -8.3 | 32-38 | 35-37 | 12-17 | 17-12 | 16-13 | -14.8 | 11-18 | 17-11 |
| in all neutral court games | 24-21 | 27-20 | 31-16 | +11.2 | 24-22 | 24-22 | 16-13 | 21-9 | 22-8 | +10.9 | 15-15 | 17-12 |
| when the line is +3 to -3 | 20-23 | 22-23 | 23-22 | -1.3 | 26-18 | 24-20 | 11-12 | 11-12 | 11-12 | -2.4 | 13-10 | 12-10 |
| as a neutral court favorite or pick | 19-14 | 18-17 | 29-6 | +18.6 | 17-17 | 16-18 | 14-9 | 16-8 | 21-3 | +14.3 | 12-12 | 13-10 |
| as a neutral court favorite of 6 points or less or pick | 9-6 | 7-9 | 11-5 | +3.5 | 7-9 | 8-7 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 7-3 | +3.3 | 5-5 | 7-2 |
| in a neutral court game where the total is 140 to 149.5 | 4-5 | 3-7 | 6-4 | +2.8 | 5-5 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | -0.2 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| when playing with one or less days rest | 20-23 | 25-19 | 31-15 | +4.1 | 21-21 | 24-20 | 5-6 | 8-3 | 8-3 | +4.5 | 6-5 | 7-4 |
| in non-conference games | 35-45 | 47-35 | 64-22 | +0.2 | 42-37 | 41-40 | 21-23 | 25-20 | 34-11 | -5.8 | 23-21 | 22-21 |
| when playing only their 2nd game in 8 days | 24-32 | 29-28 | 34-24 | -1.5 | 29-27 | 25-31 | 17-16 | 18-16 | 23-11 | +4 | 16-17 | 13-20 |
| when playing their 2nd game in 3 days | 16-21 | 21-17 | 26-14 | +2.1 | 19-19 | 21-17 | 3-5 | 6-2 | 6-2 | +3.5 | 5-3 | 5-3 |
| when playing their 2nd road game in 3 days | 7-10 | 10-8 | 12-7 | +2.8 | 9-9 | 11-7 | 3-5 | 6-2 | 6-2 | +3.5 | 5-3 | 5-3 |
| off a win against a conference rival | 36-31 | 37-30 | 38-29 | +0.8 | 34-33 | 32-33 | 25-15 | 25-15 | 26-14 | +4.2 | 19-21 | 18-21 |
| after 1 or more consecutive wins | 63-63 | 74-55 | 86-45 | -0.1 | 67-60 | 64-61 | 42-31 | 45-29 | 51-23 | -0.7 | 37-37 | 36-35 |
| after 3 or more consecutive wins | 31-22 | 33-21 | 38-16 | +6.6 | 28-26 | 31-22 | 24-10 | 21-13 | 25-9 | +5.2 | 18-16 | 18-15 |
| in all tournament games | 17-14 | 19-13 | 21-11 | +8.5 | 17-15 | 20-12 | 11-11 | 16-6 | 15-7 | +6 | 10-12 | 14-8 |
| in a post-season tournament game | 2-6 | 6-2 | 5-3 | +0.6 | 3-5 | 6-2 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 5-2 | +1.6 | 2-5 | 5-2 |
| in a NCAA tournament games | 2-5 | 6-1 | 5-2 | +2 | 3-4 | 6-1 | 2-4 | 5-1 | 5-1 | +3 | 2-4 | 5-1 |
| when seeded 4 or higher in the NCAA tournament | 2-3 | 4-1 | 5-0 | +4 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 5-0 | +4 | 1-4 | 4-1 |
| in tournament championship games | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=37% of their attempts | 20-18 | 23-14 | 19-19 | -7.3 | 20-18 | 21-16 | 13-7 | 14-6 | 12-8 | +0.3 | 11-9 | 10-9 |
| versus good shooting teams - making >=45% of their shots | 51-51 | 56-48 | 60-45 | -2.1 | 59-46 | 49-54 | 35-22 | 32-26 | 39-19 | +10.8 | 36-22 | 25-32 |
| versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=42% | 44-46 | 49-43 | 52-41 | -8.6 | 48-42 | 50-42 | 29-22 | 29-23 | 33-19 | +4.6 | 28-23 | 28-23 |
| versus excellent teams - shooting >=45% with a defense of <=42% | 29-30 | 35-25 | 32-29 | -9.4 | 33-28 | 33-28 | 19-14 | 20-14 | 23-11 | +6.4 | 19-15 | 18-16 |
| vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=72% of their attempts | 38-44 | 45-38 | 53-30 | +11.5 | 38-44 | 38-45 | 24-26 | 29-22 | 33-18 | +7 | 25-25 | 23-28 |
| versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=18 free throws/game | 28-28 | 33-23 | 40-17 | +8.8 | 31-25 | 29-26 | 11-7 | 11-8 | 15-4 | +1.2 | 11-7 | 6-12 |
| versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game | 47-47 | 55-41 | 56-40 | -14.6 | 46-48 | 48-46 | 34-23 | 34-24 | 39-19 | -2.9 | 29-28 | 25-31 |
| versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game | 35-40 | 43-34 | 35-42 | -12.4 | 44-32 | 42-33 | 25-15 | 25-15 | 22-18 | +4.2 | 24-15 | 20-18 |
| when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 80%) | 19-23 | 19-25 | 18-26 | -6.2 | 24-20 | 21-22 | 14-11 | 11-14 | 13-12 | -1.1 | 13-12 | 11-13 |
| versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game | 39-43 | 47-38 | 43-42 | -0.6 | 48-37 | 42-43 | 30-19 | 28-22 | 31-19 | +10.8 | 30-20 | 22-28 |
| versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 13-20 | 18-15 | 17-16 | -5 | 19-13 | 18-15 | 9-6 | 7-8 | 9-6 | +1.2 | 9-5 | 7-8 |
| versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game | 74-71 | 79-70 | 94-55 | +11.9 | 78-69 | 71-75 | 54-35 | 51-39 | 62-28 | +10.1 | 50-40 | 41-47 |
| versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game | 65-61 | 72-56 | 87-42 | +12.8 | 68-58 | 64-62 | 43-29 | 44-29 | 55-18 | +18.1 | 44-28 | 35-36 |
Swipe left to see more →
| Kelvin Sampson - betting records as head coach. | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career records as a head coach. | Games as head coach of Houston. | |||||||||||
| Game | Money Line | 1st Half | Game | Money Line | 1st Half | |||||||
| Description | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U |
| against SEC opponents | 17-15 | 11-14 | 18-14 | -2.6 | 15-13 | 8-17 | 8-9 | 10-7 | 9-8 | -4.8 | 7-8 | 8-9 |
| in all games | 350-300 | 242-300 | 564-175 | +57 | 365-273 | 260-279 | 201-153 | 155-196 | 301-84 | +32 | 208-141 | 177-174 |
| in all neutral court games | 78-66 | 51-75 | 104-46 | -7.1 | 81-58 | 51-73 | 47-33 | 33-44 | 60-21 | -3.5 | 47-30 | 34-42 |
| as an underdog | 70-58 | 35-71 | 45-83 | -2.2 | 68-57 | 46-58 | 33-25 | 18-35 | 21-37 | +4.6 | 35-23 | 24-29 |
| when the line is +3 to -3 | 69-47 | 38-59 | 68-48 | +12.6 | 66-47 | 46-50 | 33-17 | 22-28 | 31-19 | +10.2 | 30-20 | 29-21 |
| when the total is 140 to 149.5 | 61-42 | 39-64 | 78-26 | -3.6 | 64-35 | 44-58 | 38-28 | 28-38 | 54-13 | -2.9 | 44-21 | 27-40 |
| as a neutral court underdog or pick | 20-8 | 8-13 | 12-16 | +2.3 | 17-11 | 6-14 | 11-2 | 3-7 | 6-7 | +1.3 | 8-5 | 2-8 |
| in a neutral court game where the total is 140 to 149.5 | 11-11 | 9-13 | 17-6 | +7.6 | 15-6 | 8-15 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 11-4 | +5.6 | 13-1 | 5-10 |
| as a neutral court underdog of 6 points or less or pick | 12-6 | 6-8 | 10-8 | +5.8 | 11-7 | 4-9 | 8-2 | 3-6 | 6-4 | +4.3 | 7-3 | 2-7 |
| when playing with one or less days rest | 73-52 | 38-67 | 100-43 | +18.6 | 78-45 | 44-60 | 36-25 | 23-36 | 49-17 | +8.8 | 37-24 | 28-32 |
| in non-conference games | 129-109 | 79-122 | 256-63 | -6.4 | 126-105 | 90-111 | 79-54 | 52-77 | 132-29 | -2.3 | 75-55 | 64-66 |
| when playing only their 2nd game in 8 days | 131-102 | 96-105 | 219-57 | +45.3 | 133-98 | 102-97 | 78-57 | 67-70 | 121-26 | +43.8 | 81-52 | 69-67 |
| when playing their 2nd game in 3 days | 60-42 | 36-51 | 83-34 | +15.1 | 65-36 | 39-47 | 30-20 | 21-27 | 42-13 | +9.2 | 31-19 | 23-26 |
| when playing their 2nd road game in 3 days | 28-20 | 21-24 | 34-16 | +10.4 | 30-15 | 19-25 | 17-11 | 13-15 | 24-5 | +14 | 19-8 | 12-16 |
| after 3 or more consecutive unders | 30-25 | 33-26 | 43-17 | -9.6 | 36-21 | 33-26 | 25-19 | 25-22 | 34-14 | +1 | 28-17 | 27-20 |
| off an upset win as an underdog | 24-17 | 9-26 | 28-16 | -5.5 | 26-16 | 11-23 | 13-5 | 4-13 | 14-6 | -7 | 12-6 | 5-12 |
| after 1 or more consecutive wins | 272-223 | 187-236 | 434-127 | +58.8 | 288-197 | 195-225 | 159-120 | 124-156 | 239-60 | +20.9 | 163-112 | 135-145 |
| after 3 or more consecutive wins | 160-142 | 105-157 | 253-76 | +28.7 | 179-122 | 119-141 | 101-79 | 74-109 | 149-38 | +10.8 | 107-74 | 82-100 |
| in all tournament games | 71-58 | 49-72 | 91-43 | -14 | 72-56 | 52-67 | 44-32 | 30-43 | 55-22 | -11.7 | 42-32 | 35-37 |
| in a post-season tournament game | 25-24 | 20-29 | 32-18 | -3.5 | 25-23 | 20-28 | 13-13 | 10-17 | 19-8 | +1.8 | 13-13 | 13-14 |
| in a NCAA tournament games | 24-21 | 18-27 | 31-15 | +0.5 | 24-20 | 18-26 | 13-11 | 9-16 | 19-6 | +5.8 | 13-11 | 11-14 |
| when seeded 4 or higher in the NCAA tournament | 15-17 | 15-18 | 24-9 | -0.1 | 16-15 | 15-18 | 9-9 | 8-11 | 15-4 | +4.3 | 8-10 | 9-10 |
| in tournament championship games | 6-6 | 2-9 | 6-6 | -1.9 | 6-6 | 4-7 | 4-3 | 2-5 | 3-4 | -4.4 | 3-4 | 4-3 |
| versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=42% | 202-165 | 127-191 | 259-124 | +26.3 | 202-159 | 151-163 | 118-86 | 85-118 | 151-60 | +12.6 | 111-91 | 103-99 |
| versus good shooting teams - making >=45% of their shots | 163-132 | 101-147 | 207-104 | +19.5 | 167-123 | 111-137 | 83-61 | 60-81 | 106-44 | -0 | 84-59 | 68-75 |
| versus excellent teams - shooting >=45% with a defense of <=42% | 114-92 | 67-106 | 133-81 | +2.8 | 116-87 | 78-94 | 57-42 | 40-57 | 71-33 | -4.1 | 56-42 | 46-52 |
| versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game | 52-38 | 38-37 | 74-29 | +11.7 | 59-32 | 37-37 | 26-18 | 22-24 | 41-9 | +10.3 | 28-16 | 21-25 |
| vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=72% of their attempts | 92-74 | 68-86 | 141-35 | +35.1 | 87-74 | 67-86 | 70-57 | 55-69 | 106-24 | +28.7 | 69-56 | 57-67 |
| versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game | 125-111 | 80-122 | 159-90 | +21.8 | 141-95 | 93-110 | 65-46 | 43-68 | 80-35 | +15.6 | 70-42 | 53-59 |
| when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 80%) | 72-59 | 41-67 | 73-61 | -1.1 | 72-56 | 46-63 | 34-23 | 23-31 | 34-24 | -2.1 | 32-25 | 25-30 |
| versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game | 146-115 | 86-134 | 165-103 | +5.3 | 151-104 | 100-119 | 70-54 | 50-72 | 86-42 | -0 | 71-53 | 58-65 |
| versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game | 189-159 | 156-177 | 270-99 | +25.3 | 199-142 | 158-171 | 143-114 | 113-143 | 204-65 | +17.8 | 150-104 | 120-134 |
| versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game | 149-112 | 122-126 | 214-65 | +17.9 | 151-108 | 127-120 | 120-87 | 98-107 | 163-53 | +3.5 | 121-85 | 103-101 |